News

Paper on Ethics of Remote Sensing

I’m very happy to share a paper I co-authored with colleagues from various disciplines (urbanism, engineering, geography, architecture) but also from NGOs, public administration, as well as inhabitants of informal settlments.

It’s about the bizarre situation that scholars in the Global North can use AI-operated remote sensing to study informal settlements in the Global South. My job, together with another philosopher, was the ethics section (“The ethics of rendering informality visible”), where we hopefully made a strong case for involving the inhabitants in articulating problems, and having them benefit tangibly from the research as opposed to assuming that (perhaps) well-intentioned scholars can contribute to improving their life-conditions remotely.  

Here is a link to the paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-025-00340-9.epdf?sharing_token=l2EQMg6fJNJDJ1YjUyTQdtRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0N8lE5tX4adGQcW44YQTpsu-tgJAwYeybrk5upjlVMYK8RzSdoHkQ6E37qECIna9V7VaweoczXxv8jk-RTi5S3psPeW3z4OYc_oemIPrv5VklItw-vIvpDigyppGgijJAc%3D

(And it’s in Nature – I feel like I’m in Big Bang theory.)

Philosophy and informal settlements

The most wonderful workshop “Inclusive Cities” organised by Yael Borofsky (Collegium Helveticum) enabled me to join with scholars, practitioners and dwellers of informal settlements to discuss various issues around life in such places. I was honoured to moderate a philosophy panel with Michael Nagenborg and Isaac Oluoch on these issues:

https://collegium.ethz.ch/events/fellow-year-2023-2024/inclusive-cities

Photo credits: Jess Kersey